Friday 14 December 2012

Naxal & Terrorist



Every Indian Strategic Thinker Follow this thought for making great National Security Strategy.


Prof Yosuda.

Click on this link : http://ajitdoval.blogspot.in/2008/09/why-do-you-say-maoists-are-not.html

Defence & Strategic Studies Icon



Dear Friends,


Kindly follow the blow link. Read the articles for more knowledge about India's External & Internal Security Key. http://ajitdoval.blogspot.in/2008/09/bangladeshi-infiltration-is-biggest.html

Respected Ajit Doval Sir guide to us towards security thought.

Mooljian Salute to Shree Doval Sir.




http://ajitdoval.blogspot.in/2008/09/bangladeshi-infiltration-is-biggest.html

Thank you.

Thursday 20 September 2012

Career in Indian Navy

Dear Students,

you can test your eligibility for career in Indian Navy  (After X, XII, Deploma, Eng., / Any Graduatate / Post Graduate.) as a officer.

Indian Navy Guide Link.


http://nausena-bharti.nic.in/eligible.php

Thursday 19 July 2012

Thought process on War and Peace

"War and Peace"

Today we have need to Nation First Ideology but with bace on Peace.

Conflict and Resolution study can give the best guidline to maintain balance between War and Peace.





What is thinking about 'Conflict Resolution' in various Universities?


Prof Yosuda
Dept of Defence and Strategic Studies

Thursday 28 June 2012

For English Improvement and social work through online

Dear Students,

              You can daily visit http://freerice.com/#/english-vocabulary/1541 on this link. give right answer and help some poor and hungree peoples. you have need to give maximum answer (only choses / find out the similar / opposite word).

 You have benificial for competetive exams, daily life, marketing, interview, research etc....

http://freerice.com/#/english-vocabulary/1541
FREE RICE . COM IS SOCIAL WEBSITE.




Dept of Defence Studies
M.J.College..

SSB Tips for NCC Cadets (Mooljiance)

Dear Students (Mooljiance)

Short Service Commission (Technical & Non Technical ) for Men & Women.

Adv Reff.: June 23rd , 2012 The Hindu Advertisement




Dept of Defence & Strtaegic Studies,
M J College.


Link for SSB Interview Tips
http://www.ssbinterviewtips.com/2012/01/online-application-for-39th-short.html

Monday 2 April 2012

The Changing Discourse of NSCN

Dear UG & PG Students,
Kindly read below article ....
Prof Yosuda,
Defence & Strategic Studies Dept.


 The National Socialist Council of Nagalim led by Isak Chisi Swu and Thuingaleng Muivah—NSCN (IM)—celebrated its 33rd “Republic Day” in Camp Hebron, the armed group’s headquarters in Nagaland. Situated at a distance of 35 kms from Dimapur, the main town in Nagaland, Camp Hebron is well connected with a metal road in the midst of a picturesque landscape. During the celebrations, Isak Chisi Swu, the Chairman of the NSCN (IM), gave a speech which is notable for several reasons with regard to the Naga peace process underway since 1997.

http://idsa.in/idsacomments/TheChangingDiscourseofNSCNIM_NamrataGoswami_300312

Sunday 11 March 2012

INDIA AND IRAN CHANGING ENERGY RELATIONS.

"INDIA'S ENERGY SECURITY ISSUES"

Dealing with sanctions on IranIndia’s energy security can’t be compromisedby G. Parthasarathy

WITH the US Presidential elections due later this year, President Obama has to be seen to be acting “tough” on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Israel plays a key role in shaping American policies on Iran. The Iranians have not helped their own cause by threatening to “wipe out” Israel and backing radical Arab groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, which are perceived as acting as spoilers in the Middle-East peace process. Virtually, Iran’s all Sunni Arab neighbours also fear Iranian intentions and echo international concern on the lack of transparency in its nuclear programme.
With Iran threatening to shut the vital sea lanes of the Straits of Hormuz in the event of being attacked, Israel and the US appear to have been persuaded that military strikes would be counterproductive. Moreover, American National Intelligence Estimates have concluded that Iran is still one to three years away from assembling a nuclear weapon. President Obama has, therefore, acted continuously to tighten sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
On December 31, Mr. Obama approved US legislation imposing sanctions on foreign banks dealing with Iran’s Central Bank, by channelling payments for Iranian oil exports. The President can exempt sanctions for six months on a country that significantly reduces its dealings with Iran in situations where it is in US national security interests, or would be necessary for ensuring market stability. Sanctioned financial institutions would be frozen out of the US market. Within weeks, the European Union (EU) followed suit, imposing sanctions on oil imports from Iran. These sanctions will come into effect on July 1.
EU members like Greece, Italy and Spain will be adversely affected by these sanctions. Debt-ridden Greece is likely to seek exemption, given its large exposure to oil imports on favourable terms from Iran. Within Asia, the major importers of Iranian crude are China, India, Japan and South Korea. Iran is China’s third largest supplier, at 500,000 barrels per day. Moreover, China has committed huge investments in the oil and gas industry in Iran.
India has been hit hard by the expanding Western sanctions on Iran’s oil and gas sector. With its surplus oil refining capacity, India’s exports of refined petroleum products reached around $40 billion last year. Refined petroleum products are India’s largest foreign exchange earner in foreign trade. But American sanctions have constricted our export market. Iran is a major importer of refined petroleum products and exports to Iran from the Reliance Oil Refinery in Junagadh have been progressively reduced and ended in the face of American sanctions on exports of refined petroleum products to Iran. This is primarily because Reliance Industries, like most of our large industrial enterprises and financial institutions, has substantial business and financial interests in the US.
Towards the end of 2010, the US worked with its European partners to close the avenues for payments using European banks, which India was making to Iran, through the Asian Clearing Union, for its oil imports. Pushed to a corner, India had to look for banks across the world for oil payments to Iran, with an agreement finally being reached for payments through Turkey’s Halkbank in July 2011.
Anticipating the tightening of sanctions on Iran’s oil exports, India has worked to quietly reduce its exposure to Iranian oil imports, which are likely to fall to an estimated 13 million tonnes in this financial year from 21.2 million tonnes barely two years ago. In the wake of improving relations after the visit of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, India is reported to have received assurances from the Saudis that they would be happy to meet any shortfalls we may face following reductions in imports from Iran. The Saudis are also reported to have given China similar assurances.
China has been particularly pro-active in dealing with the emerging situation, with Premier Wen Jiabao visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE earlier this month. Wen’s visit to Saudi Arabia led to a Chinese investment of $8.5 billion in an oil refinery which will process offshore oil for shipment through a pipeline bypassing the volatile Straits of Hormuz. Similar investments by China are envisaged in Abu Dhabi. Like in Central Asia, China has acted more deftly and imaginatively than India has in the Persian Gulf in guaranteeing its energy security.
India will now have to move imaginatively and expeditiously to devise alternate payment mechanisms for Iranian oil imports. Statements by Halkbank representatives indicate that Turkey will fall in line by July 1 with American and EU sanctions on Iranian oil exports. One option for India would be to see if payments are possible through Russia, the largest oil producer in the world, through a bank like the Gazprom Bank, which has dealings with Iran. But there are reportedly indications that while Russia may back Iran against unilateral American sanctions, it may not like to directly undermine Western sanctions. Another possibility is to consider using our currency swap arrangement with Japan for Iranian oil payments. But this again may prove unworkable, given the fact that Japan itself has formally asked the US for a six-month waiver of sanctions on its oil imports from Iran. While a rupee trade arrangement with Iran may be ideal, it remains doubtful if this is possible, given the fact that the rupee has been the worst performing Asian currency in 2011. Moreover, the viability of such an arrangement may be limited, given the huge trade deficit we have with Iran.
Despite these difficulties and the fact that Iran has been an unreliable partner in honouring contracts it has signed on the supply of gas to India, we should seek innovative means, including the use of Indian banks, which do not have exposure to American markets and financial institutions, for routing payments for oil imports from Iran. The Americans cannot claim to be our “strategic partners” on the one hand while undermining our energy security on the other. Moreover, given the uncertainties on American policies in Afghanistan, Iran, which is our primary gateway to Afghanistan and Central Asia, will remain a crucial partner for facilitating access to and safeguarding our interests in Afghanistan.
There are concerns that, like in Iraq, the Americans will withdraw completely from Afghanistan in 2014, leaving behind an unstable, financially bankrupt and violence-ridden country. Iran and India would find a destabilised and dysfunctional Afghanistan, which will again become a haven for terrorism, a source of serious and common concern. The Iranians, in turn, will, however, have to be advised to be more transparent on their nuclear programme if they are to overcome their growing international isolation.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120202/edit.htm

Wednesday 29 February 2012

Defence economics chapter II (Semister II)

Dear PG (M.A. Jr) Studets ( Defence & Strategic Studies )
Kindly follow below link for get more knowledge.




Prof Y S Borse.

motivational


Defence Economics - Defence Budget Analysis


Figures sourced from the SIPRI military expenditure database.
Rank

Country
Spending ($)[2]
 % of GDP
Per capita ($)
0

a
0
0
0

World Total
1,546,529,200,000
2.2%

1
687,105,000,000
4.7%
2,141
2
114,300,000,000
2.2%
74
3
61,285,000,000
2.5%
931
4
57,424,000,000
2.7%
922
5
52,586,000,000
4.3%
430
6
51,420,000,000
1.0%
401
7
46,848,000,000
1.4%
558
8
42,917,000,000
11.2%
1,524
9
38,198,000,000
1.8%
593
10
34,816,000,000
2.8%
30
11
28,096,000,000
1.6%
142
12
24,270,000,000
2.9%
493
13
20,164,000,000
1.5%
560
14
19,799,000,000
1.9%
893
15
15,803,000,000
1.1%
398
16
15,749,000,000
7.3%
2,653
17
15,634,000,000
2.7%
244
18
13,001,000,000
6.3%
1,882
19
11,604,000,000
1.5%
759
20
9,369,000,000
3.2%
1,230
21
9,191,000,000
3.7%
198
22
8,535,000,000
2.4%
380
23
8,380,000,000
1.8%
285
24
7,651,000,000
4.3%
1,593
25
7,044,000,000b
1.8%b

26
6,322,000,000
1.6%
1,245
27
6,198,000,000
3.5%

28
6,009,000,000
0.9%

29
5,586,000,000
3.8%

30
5,382,000,000
1.2%
525
31
5,248,000,000
1.2%
657
32
5,213,000,000
2.1%

33
5,160,000,000
2.8%
28
34
4,859,000,000
0.5%
48
35
4,663,000,000
5.4%

36
4,588,000,000
1.4%
804
37
4,392,000,000
0.8%
526
38
4,336,000,000
1.9%

39
4,411,000,000
4.4%
1,289
40
4,047,000,000
9.7%

41
3,914,000,000
2.1%

42
3,774,000,000
4.2%

43
3,735,000,000
1.3%
78
44
3,718,000,000
1.5%
702
45
3,446,000,000
0.9%

46
3,442,000,000
2.9%

47
3,259,000,000
2.0%

48
3,256,000,000
3.4%

49
3,179,000,000
1.0%
65
50
3,106,000,000
1.3%

51
2,529,000,000
1.4%

52
2,410,000,000
2.5%

53
2,236,000,000
4.0%

54
2,164,000,000
1.4%

55
1,992,000,000
1.4%

56
1,991,000,000c
3.4%c

57
1,724,000,000
0.9%

58
1,564,000,000
4.1%

59
1,486,000,000
0.8%

60
1,421,000,000
3.4%

61
1,363,000,000
6.1%

62
1,358,000,000
1.2%

63
1,354,000,000
0.6%

64
1,323,000,000
1.1%

65
1,280,000,000
3.5%

66
1,227,000,000
1.2%

67
1,222,000,000b
3.9%b

68
1,137,000,000
1.0%

69
1,100,000,000b
1.2%b

70
1,060,000,000
1.8%

71
1,010,000,000
1.4%

72
920,000,000
2.3%

73
823,000,000 [3].
5.9%

74
788,000,000
1.6%

75
731,000,000
3.7%
911
76
726,000,000
1.4%

77
698,000,000
2.0%

78
594,000,000
2.0%

79
548,000,000
1.3%

80
510,000,000
1.8%

81
491,000,000
1.6%

82
469,000,000d
20.9%d

84
427,000,000
1.4%

85
404,000,000
4.2%

86
368,000,000
1.6%

87
353,000,000b
1.5%

88
352,000,000
3.0%

89
338,000,000
1.0%

90
336,000,000
2.3%

91
329,000,000
3.7%

92
327,000,000
3.1%
866
93
322,000,000
0.7%

94
314,000,000
2.0%

95
301,000,000a
0.6%
809
96
276,000,000
1.8%

97
268,000,000
1.4%

98
250,000,000j
1.8%

99
243,000,000
1.7%

100
242,000,000
6.2%

101
235,000,000
1.5%

102
233,000,000e
2.9%e

103
232,000,000
1.3%

104
217,000,000j
1.1%

105
207,000,000
1.6%

106
207,000,000
2.0%

107
201,000,000
2.1%

108
191,000,000j
1.1%

109
183,000,000
1.9%

110
167,000,000j
3.6%

111
163,000,000
1.0%

112
161,000,000
0.4%

113
146,000,000e
1.0%e

114
146,000,000
0.9%

115
145,000,000
1.7%

116
140,000,000
1.2%

117
133,000,000
1.1%b

118
133,000,000
0.7%

119
115,000,000
0.7%

120
115,000,000j
3.8%

121
102,000,000
3.1%

122
99,900,000f
2.2%f

123
95,200,000
0.9%

124
93,800,000
1.9%c

125
86,300,000
0.9%

126
77,200,000
1.4%

127
70,100,000d
0.5%d

128
65,600,000b
1.0%b

129
58,800,000
0.7%

130
55,700,000
0.8%

131
55,400,000f
2.2%f

132
55,100,000b
1.7%b

133
52,900,000
1.8%

134
50,200,000j
1.7%

135
49,200,000
0.5%b

136
48,600,000a
1.2%a

137
47,400,000
1.0%

138
46,900,000b
3.8%

139
45,600,000j
2.8%j

140
44,100,000
0.7%

141
42,900,000b
2.4%

142
39,100,000
0.5%

143
36,900,000b
3.7%b

144
19,000,000
0.5%

145
18,400,000j
0.3%

146
15,700,000g
2.1% g

147
14,900,000
1.2%

148
14,000,000b
0.2%b

149
9,900,000j
0.1%

150
8,800,000
0.5%

151
8,100,000h
0.8%h

152
7,200,000j
0.8%

153
6,600,000
1.2%

154
4,600,000a
0.6%a


References


References

India under non traditional threats in new globalisation era

India is fastest growing economy in the world. Growing economy has facing growing threats. in contemporary era, researchers are threats are ...